Setting an Outcome Baseline
How to measure a number before you try to move it, so that when it moves, everyone agrees why. Six steps, one checklist, and the mistakes that make results impossible to prove.
Every AI program eventually meets the same question from a CFO: what changed because of this? Without a baseline, the honest answer is that nobody knows. The number may have moved, but it may have been moving anyway, or the definition may have shifted, or the team may be counting a different thing than finance is.
An Outcome Baseline settles that before any work starts. It takes a few weeks, it is mostly careful measurement, and it is the difference between a result you can report to a board and an anecdote.
1. Pick one number
Not a theme, a dashboard or a set of KPIs. One number that the business already cares about. A good outcome number passes four tests:
- Leadership already sees it. It appears in a board pack, an operating review or a plan.
- One person owns it. A named leader would be asked about it if it fell.
- It can move within a quarter. Not a five-year metric that hides every change.
- Your systems already hold it. It can be counted from records, not from a survey.
2. Define it exactly
Most disputes about results are really disputes about definitions. Write the number down so precisely that two analysts would count it the same way, and have finance agree to it.
- Counts
- Prescriptions signed for referred patients
- Out of
- Eligible referrals received in the same cohort week
- Excludes
- Duplicate referrals; patients outside coverage
- Window
- Prescription within 60 days of referral
- Source
- EHR referrals and the order system
- Owner
- VP Patient Access
- Agreed by
- Finance, before work starts
3. Measure the history
Pull at least a quarter of history, and a full year if seasonality matters. Look at the level, the trend and the spread. The baseline is not one number on one day: it is where the number normally sits, and how much it wobbles on its own.
The shaded band matters as much as the median. A week above the median proves nothing. A sustained move above the band does.
4. Find where it stalls
Map the path the number travels: each stage, who owns it, which system records it, and how long items normally wait there. Then find the leak, the stage that loses the most. The leak is where the first Outcome App will work, and it is what makes the target believable.
On the Referral to Rx page you can see a worked example: five stages, five owners, and a benefits step that loses one in four patients.
5. Agree the target and the date
Size the target from the leak, not from ambition. If the leak loses 26% of patients and the app can recover a third of that, the target follows. Write down the target, the date, and the owner who signs it. A target that the owner did not agree to will not be defended when the number is reviewed.
6. Agree how you will count
Before anything goes live, agree how movement will be reported: weekly, against the baseline band, from the same source systems, with any change to the definition logged and dated. When the number moves, there is then nothing left to argue about except what to do next.
The Baseline checklist
0 of 8Who does what
Reads the history from your systems, drafts the definition, measures the baseline and its range, maps the path and the leak, and sizes the target.
Names the owner, grants read access, agrees the definition with finance, and signs the target and the date.
If the Baseline shows that an Outcome App is not the right lever for your number, we will say so in writing. That is part of the point.