Why referrals stall before the prescription
A device referral crosses four teams and five systems before anyone signs a prescription. Most of the referrals that are lost were never declined. They went quiet between handoffs.
Ask a commercial leader at a medical device company where referrals are lost, and the first answer is usually the patient: they changed their mind, or nobody could reach them. Look at the records and a different picture appears. Most referrals that never become prescriptions were never refused. They waited at a handoff that nobody owned, until they expired.
This note follows a referral from the moment it arrives to the signed prescription. It shows where referrals typically wait, who could move them, and what follow-through looks like at each step.
About field notes. Field notes describe how a process typically runs and where it typically breaks. The figures are sample data, not any company's results.
Out of 1,000 referrals
- ReferredReferring practice
- Patient contactedPatient access−188 (19%)
- Benefits verifiedBenefits team−208 (26%)
- EvaluatedClinic−133 (22%)
- PrescribedPrescriber−91 (19%)
The path, and who owns each step
Five steps, four teams and at least five systems. The referring practice sends the referral by fax, e-referral or the EHR. Patient access has to reach the patient. A benefits team checks coverage and, often, prior authorization in payer portals. The clinic evaluates the patient. A prescriber signs the order.
Each team measures its own step, and usually measures it well. Nobody measures the path. So the question that matters, how many referrals became prescriptions this week and where the rest are, has no owner and no answer.
Four places a referral goes quiet
First contact
The referral arrives by fax or e-referral and lands in a shared inbox. Patient access calls once, leaves a message, and the referral slides down a list sorted by date received.
Benefits and prior authorization
The biggest leak in most samples. Prior authorization needs clinical notes the benefits team does not have. The request waits on the referring practice, the practice assumes the device company is handling it, and the payer's clock runs out.
Evaluation
Coverage is confirmed but the evaluation is not booked, or booked and missed. Notes from the visit sit unsigned, so the next step cannot start.
Signature
The order is complete and waits in the prescriber's queue behind everything else. It is the cheapest loss to fix and the most frustrating one.
One referral, 23 days
- Day 0Received
- Days 1–3Waiting: in the shared inbox
- Day 4Contacted
- Days 5–13Waiting: for clinical notes
- Day 14Verified
- Days 15–19Waiting: for a visit slot
- Day 20Evaluated
- Days 21–23Waiting: for a signature
- Day 23Prescribed
Most of the time is waiting, not work
Put one referral's days on a line and the problem is plain. In the sample above, people worked on the referral for three days out of twenty-three. The other twenty it waited: in an inbox, for notes, for a slot, for a signature. Every wait had someone who could have moved it. None of them knew it was theirs.
This is why adding staff to one team rarely moves the conversion rate. The waits sit between teams, so they belong to none of them.
Most lost referrals were never declined. They waited at a handoff nobody owned.
What follow-through looks like
Follow-through is not more reminders. It is four rules, applied to every referral, every day.
Each step has an agreed time, set by the person who owns the number. A referral past its clock is stalled, whatever the reason.
Every stalled referral has a named person and a specific action with a due date, not a place in a shared queue.
Routine actions go ahead within agreed rules. Anything outside them goes to the outcome owner, and every approval is logged.
A referral moves forward when the EHR or the order system shows it, not when someone marks a task done.
The number to watch
Track one number each week, from source systems: the eligible referral-to-Rx rate. Alongside it, track how many referrals are past their clock at each step. The first tells you whether things are getting better. The second tells you where to look this week.
- Counts
- Prescriptions signed for referred patients
- Out of
- Eligible referrals received in the same cohort week
- Excludes
- Duplicate referrals; patients outside coverage
- Owner
- VP Patient Access or Commercial Operations
Five questions to ask this week
- How many open referrals have had no successful patient contact in two working days?
- Which step loses the most referrals, and who owns it?
- How many prior authorizations are waiting on clinical notes, and who is chasing them?
- How many orders are waiting for a signature right now?
- Could you report last week's referral-to-Rx rate from source systems today?
If the answers take more than a day to find, that is the first finding. An Outcome Baseline measures this path with your team and finds your leak before anything is built. Read the Baseline guide.